Beginner question

Is Machiavelli's The Prince worth reading?

Short answer: Yes, if you want to understand political power: it's short (151 pages in Mansfield's edition). Pick an edition with notes; our pick is Harvey Mansfield's translation (editorial), with Bondanella (Oxford) a strong alternative.

What people type into Google: “is the prince worth reading”, “is machiavelli the prince worth reading”, “is the prince by machiavelli worth reading reddit”, “machiavelli prince best translation”

What to read with The Prince

  1. The Prince (tr. Harvey Mansfield)

    Niccolò Machiavelli

    Short: 151 pages in this edition. Widely called the standard translation, with a glossary and notes.

    151 pp≈4 h●○○ Gentle

    Read this first: Chapters XV–XVIII hold the famous arguments about virtue, cruelty and keeping faith.

    Edition: University of Chicago Press · ISBN 9780226500447

  2. Discourses on Livy

    Niccolò Machiavelli

    The republican Machiavelli. Readers on r/books call The Prince the 'Sparks Notes' for it.

    424 pp≈11 h●●● Demanding

    Edition: University of Chicago Press · ISBN 9780226500362

  3. Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction

    Quentin Skinner

    Context from a leading historian of political thought.

    Edition not yet verified; link opens a Bookshop search.

  4. The 48 Laws of Power

    Robert Greene

    Popular, not academic the modern self-help take, read best after the original.

    463 pp≈12 h●○○ Gentle

    Edition: Profile Books Ltd · ISBN 9781861972781

Best translation of The Prince

Our pick: Harvey Mansfield (University of Chicago Press). r/PoliticalPhilosophy replies call it 'the current gold standard'; the publisher quotes reviewers praising its balance of accuracy and readability. Alternatives: Peter Bondanella (Oxford World's Classics, introduction by Maurizio Viroli, based on the Inglese critical text), Russell Price (Cambridge, introduction by Quentin Skinner), and George Bull (Penguin).

Free public-domain sample (W. K. Marriott translation, Chapter XVII):

Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with.

Source: Project Gutenberg #1232. Mansfield is in copyright, so we don't quote it.

Where people get stuck

Frequently asked questions

Is The Prince worth reading?

Yes, if you want to understand political power; it's short. Our verdict is editorial; the threads we cite are broadly positive.

Is it hard to read?

The text is short; the many historical names are the hard part, so choose an edition with notes.

Does it say 'the end justifies the means'?

Not in those words. A commenter on r/PoliticalPhilosophy notes Bondanella renders the line closer to 'one must consider the final result'.

Related reading orders

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6